The Wallstreet Journal was a great "textbook." The fact that it offered up-to-date
information because it is a newspaper was a great advantage. Textbooks are usually out of date
or even relevant to the market conditions that are currently on-going. The Wallstreet Journal
was a cheaper alternative that provided great knowledge. I use information I've read in the
Journal in everday conversation with my boss and district managers. They are usually
impressed and look forward to talking to me when they visit. Although, I must say I offered
great conversation before anyways.
The Wallstreet Journal offers a comprehensive look at what's going on in the business market,
stock market and world news. All of these aspects are important for our generation to start
becoming more informed on. We will be running the world on day; we should know what to
expect in our future and not go into in blindsided.
Overall, The Wallstreet Journal was a great guide for the classroom. I definitely plan on
renewing my subscription.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
The Road
The Road was definitely a whole new experience for me as a reader, and the movie did not
lack in living up to the stupendous novel.
I really did think the movie was going to be some exaggerated Hollywood production.
Surprisingly, it stayed true to the novel and only embellished a few things. The part where the
father and son go down into the cellar with the naked people showed a relatively large group in
the movie versus the couple in the book. They also ran (kind of) after the characters in the film,
which I do not remember happening in the novel.
Also the movie had a few more happier moments as the father has multiple flashbacks of his
wife as the were at the beach or laying outside on the grass. The book had no such memories. I
assume they wanted to give audiences brief moments of happiness in order to not overwhelm
them with the multitude of depressing moments in the film.
Other than a few minor details, the movie and novel were comparable. I, however, enjoyed
book more. I tend to like the range a book gives a reader. The author can only do so much when
he describes scenarios; the left is up to the reader. In the film, audiences are subjected to the
filmmaker's take on the novel.
I also enjoyed the challenge of reading the novel. The lack of proper punctuation and
grammar in general made the book a completely new experience for me. Yet, this same horrible
structure made the book simplistic. It stripped the English language bare of its rules in the way
this post-apocalyptic world stripped some humanity from its morals.
lack in living up to the stupendous novel.
I really did think the movie was going to be some exaggerated Hollywood production.
Surprisingly, it stayed true to the novel and only embellished a few things. The part where the
father and son go down into the cellar with the naked people showed a relatively large group in
the movie versus the couple in the book. They also ran (kind of) after the characters in the film,
which I do not remember happening in the novel.
Also the movie had a few more happier moments as the father has multiple flashbacks of his
wife as the were at the beach or laying outside on the grass. The book had no such memories. I
assume they wanted to give audiences brief moments of happiness in order to not overwhelm
them with the multitude of depressing moments in the film.
Other than a few minor details, the movie and novel were comparable. I, however, enjoyed
book more. I tend to like the range a book gives a reader. The author can only do so much when
he describes scenarios; the left is up to the reader. In the film, audiences are subjected to the
filmmaker's take on the novel.
I also enjoyed the challenge of reading the novel. The lack of proper punctuation and
grammar in general made the book a completely new experience for me. Yet, this same horrible
structure made the book simplistic. It stripped the English language bare of its rules in the way
this post-apocalyptic world stripped some humanity from its morals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
